Cadilac or BMW?

LETS HAVE A VOTE.-------------- just like say the car brand

and tell me why its better and have a good reason not just like this one --- ''ohhh i think the cadilac [or BMW] is better because it looks better than the other one mmmmhmmm yup...``

so have good reason why which is better

Cadilac or BMW?kawasaki

BMW all the way!

First of all, it's superior to Cadilac's engineering. (Not pertaining that American engineering is bad, look at the Corvette! It destroys Ferraris and Lamborghinis for 1/5 of the price). Germany tends to make better safety standards, better performance, luxury, and longer lasting cars than Cadilac.

The Cadilac only has the CTS-V and the XLR-V for their performance cars, while BMW has a much more vast selection of cars from the 1-series (Coming out this summer) to the 6-series. You also get much more status in society if you're looked upon in a Bimmer, not a Caddy.

The CTS-V has a supercharged Corvette V8 engine, and that propels it from 0-60 in an astonishing 4.6 seconds. Same with the XLR-V, except that it doesn't have a Corvette V8 under its bonnet.

BMW however, makes their cars much more refined and therefore, looks more adept to the world. If you had qualms about your car breaking down, throw them out the window. The only aspect of BMW you should be skeptical about is how much the parts are. The BMW 335i I personally cogitate is the best deal in the market today. For about $40,000, you'll be able to rocket from a 0-60 in a stupendous and phenomonal 4.8 seconds. The M6 will do it in 4.2, putting it far against any XLR-V or CTS-V at the drag strip or on the track.